The Leader - Follower Partnership: It's a New Day
“Leaders
rarely use their power wisely or effectively over long periods unless they are
supported by followers who have the stature to help them do so.” – Ira Chaleff, The Courageous Follower,
Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc., 2003
Organizations are successful or not partly on the
basis of how well their leaders lead, but also in great part on the basis of
how well their followers follow. Surely improving the performance of followers
should be worthwhile. What is the role of the follower and how does it affect
leadership behavior and effectiveness? How can members of the executive team
participate more effectively to create a truly dynamic partnership relationship
with their leader? The relationship between leader and follower is truly
symbiotic - you can't have one without the other.
When there is a crisis, when a company fails or
commits some malfeasance, everyone cries out: “How could that have happened
here? How come nobody said anything?”
Followers have a responsibility to speak up. And the organization, if it
wishes to be sustainably successful, has an equal obligation to create the
environment for them to safely do so.
No matter how much partnership and empowerment there
is, the CEO has ultimate authority and responsibility. But what about the responsibilities
of the CEO’s followers? The most capable team members fail when they gripe
about their leader but do not say or do anything to help him or her improve or
get back on track. To do this requires both courage and skill.
The movement away from command and control
leadership has brought new leadership styles that are more democratic and
coach-like. The terms “shared leadership,” and “servant leader” are used to
describe some of these new ways of interacting. There are also new ways of
interacting in the follower role. Setting aside possible aversion to the term,
the new flatter business organization requires more responsible followers and
more follower-friendly leaders.
Managing the Boss
It is difficult to appreciate the pressures on the
leader unless you have had that position.
While ego-strength is a quality to be desired in a leader, it can
be overly reinforced and transformed into ego-driven. The pressures at
the top need to be managed. Courageous
followers help leaders stay on track and manage their decision-making processes
in the right direction. Responsible and effective followers have a critical
role in maintaining the desired partnering dynamics.
Many executive team members do some of these things
quite naturally. But often they are hesitant to speak up when the leader makes
mistakes, whether they are made from the best of intentions or the worst. After
all, “She’s (or he’s) the boss.” Although we’ve grown beyond an authoritarian
leadership model where followers have no accountability, we haven’t yet
developed a model for responsible participation at the follower level for the
new leadership styles.
In his book (The Courageous Follower, 2003) Ira
Chaleff points out that the old paradigm of the leader/follower is based on
power. The leader has traditionally had
the "power" to award perks, benefits, bonuses, choice assignments,
promotions and the like. He/she often
holds the keys to attaining these. This
has led to a relationship in which the follower avoids jeopardizing their
chances of obtaining these rewards.
Hence, the follower tends to do what the leader wants and, just as
important, not offend or create a negative impression of themselves. A relationship based on this kind of power
does not serve the organization, the leader or the follower because it shuts
down the open flow of communication and candor a leader needs in order to
optimize their effectiveness. After
all, who will tell the emperor he has no clothes?

Chaleff sees a very different kind of relationship
between leader and follower. He
suggests a relationship where the leader and follower have equal power but
different roles that orbit around support and fulfillment of the organizations'
purpose. When both the leader and
follower are focused on the common purpose a new relationship between them
arises. This new relationship is
candid, respectful, supportive and challenging. It is a relationship that honors open communication, honesty and
trust from both parties.
Many in leadership positions bemoan the fact that
they're not getting full and candid information from their staffs. Being aware of all the facts or data is
crucial for effective decision making.
And yet, in too many situations, followers are reluctant to present
negative information for fear of repercussions. Case in point: How many organizations have recently had to
"restate" or correct their earnings statements after the fact due to
oversights, errors or even malfeasance?
And why, in those situations, did people not step up and state their
misgivings? In an environment where the
focus of both leaders and followers is on serving the purpose of the
organization these problems are far less likely to occur. In such an environment, followers would be
giving full voice to their concerns and instincts and leaders would welcome,
value and pay attention to them.
The Job of Effective Followers
The sooner we recognize and accept our powerful
position as followers, the sooner we can fully develop responsible, synergistic
relationships in our organizations. According to Chaleff, there are three
things we need to understand in order to fully assume responsibility as
followers.
The Five Dimensions of Courageous Followership
Chaleff identifies and defines what is required of
followers to become an equal partner with the leader in fulfilling the purpose
of the organization.
The Courage to Assume Responsibility. Courageous followers assume responsibility for themselves and the
organization. They do not hold a
paternalistic image of the leader or organization, nor do they expect either to
provide for their security and growth or give them permission to act. They initiate values based action. Their "authority" comes from their
understanding and ownership of the common purpose.
The Courage to Serve. Courageous followers are not afraid of hard work and they assume
additional responsibilities to unburden the leader and serve the
organization. They stand up for the
leader and the tough decisions he/she must make. They are as passionate as the leader in pursuit of the common
purpose.
The Courage to Challenge. Courageous followers give voice to the discomfort they feel when
the behaviors or policies of the leader or group conflict with their sense of
what is right. They are willing to
stand up, stand out, to risk rejection and to initiate conflict in order to
examine the actions of the leader or group when appropriate.
The Courage to Participate in Transformation. Courageous followers champion the need for change and stay with
the leader and group while they mutually struggle with the difficulty of real
change. They examine their own need for
transformation and become full participants in the change process as
appropriate.
The Courage to Take Moral Action. Courageous followers know when it is time to take a stand that is
different from the leaders. The stand
may involve refusing to obey a direct order, appealing the order to the next
level of authority, or tendering one's resignation. This may involve personal risk but service to the common purpose
justifies and sometimes demands such action.
Another View
Robert E. Kelley in his landmark article in Harvard
Business Review "In Praise of Followers" (1988), states “In an organization
of effective followers, a leader tends to be more an overseer of change and
progress than a hero. As organizational structures flatten, the quality of
those who follow will become more and more important.” He sees four essential qualities of effective
followers.
In information-age organizations, hundreds of
decentralized units process and rapidly act on varied input within the design
and purpose of the organization. This requires an entirely different
relationship between leaders and followers.
Speaking up to the Boss
Part of the problem in following responsibly and
courageously lies in the tendency for people to relate to authority figures as
they would in a parent-child relationship. Early childhood memories are deeply
embedded in the subconscious and trigger old patterns of behavior and emotion
in a split second. These memories are often outside of our awareness, and it
doesn’t take much - a look, a tone of voice - to trigger anger or
anxiety when confronted by the boss. Developing one’s emotional intelligence
(Daniel Goleman, Primal Leadership, 2002), can help regulate these split second
reactions and allow more productive and satisfying interactions.
The danger in the leader-follower relationship is
the assumption that the leader’s interpretation must dominate. If this
assumption exists on the part of either the leader or the follower, both are at
risk. The leader’s openness will diminish. Followers will easily lose their
unique perspective and abandon healthy disagreement. Creativity and
problem-solving processes become stifled.
It is a primary duty of highly effective leaders to
create an environment where support and challenge flourish in a balanced
manner. Though it may not be an easy
task to speak up and challenge the leader, without the courage and skill to do
so, corporate scandals will continue to occur. Creating an environment of
partnership as well as learning to provide candid feedback to the boss are
skills not often given high priority.
Working with a neutral party such as an executive coach can help both
leaders and followers develop these abilities and become more courageous and
effective.
Resources
for Follow the Leader
Chaleff, I. (2002). The Courageous Follower,
Standing up to & for Our Leaders. (2nd ed.). San Francisco,
CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. (2002). Primal
Leadership, Realizing the Power of Emotional Intelligence. Boston: Harvard
Business School Press.
Greenleaf, R. K. (1998). The Power of Servant
Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
Kelley, R. E. (1988, Nov.-Dec.). In Praise of
Followers. Harvard Business Review. Reprint 88606.